The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid funding have proposed a rule to rent “routinely purchased” DME items falling under the three-year minimum lifetime requirement and that have allowables of more than $150.
Under the proposed rule, Medicare would only purchase an item outright if its statistics show that the agency purchased the item 75 percent or more of the time during the period of July 1986 through June 1987. If not, those items would be reimbursed on a 13-month capped rental basis.
“We expect that the overall impact of reaffirming the definition of routinely purchased DME and our proposal for classifying certain expensive items as cap rental would be a decrease in expenditures because payment on a 13-month capped rental basis rather than a lump sum purchase basis for certain, very expensive items would lower total payments for these items and because many beneficiaries would not rent the items for as long as 13 months,” CMS wrote in the text of its proposed rule.
Rita Hostak, vice president of government relations for Sunrise Medical, said in an interview with HME Business’s sister publication, Mobility Management, that CRT devices are once again suffering from being lumped together with DME.
She notes, for instance, that CMS cites eight months as the average rental time for DME – which is why the agency believes it can save money on CRT by renting equipment for eight months rather than paying outright for it.
“But they’re looking at standard equipment, and you can’t compare that,” Hostak points out. “You’re talking about people who may be in hospice; you’re talking about people that have had hip surgery and only need their wheelchairs until they’ve completed their rehab. You’re talking about elderly Medicare beneficiaries who are either dealing with an acute illness or possibly end-of-life sorts of stuff when you start talking about hospital beds and things like that.”
That’s not an accurate assessment of the group of beneficiaries using CRT, Hostak says.
“But when you’re talking about wheelchairs for people with permanent disabilities and pediatric wheelchairs, these people are not end of life,” she explains. “They’re not even sick! They just have a disability and need the technology to allow them to be more functional and independent. So I think [CMS’s] cost savings [predictions] are incredibly flawed.”
To read the full interview with Hostak, read “Industry Responds to CRT Capped-Rental Proposed Rule” on the HME-Business.com.